Which evaluation method is described as a 360-degree evaluation?

Which evaluation method is described as a 360-degree evaluation?

• A. Narrative evaluations
• B. Peer evaluations
• C. Self-evaluations
• D. 360-degree evaluations

Answer: (D)

A 360-degree evaluation gathers feedback from multiple sources around the employee—supervisors, peers, direct reports, and often customers—along with the employee’s own self-assessment. This broad input creates a well-rounded, balanced view of performance, helping highlight strengths and identify development areas that a single evaluator might miss. The idea is to compare how the person sees themselves with how others see their work, which can reveal blind spots and provide richer direction for growth. In contrast, other methods sit at a single vantage point: narrative evaluations are usually written by one evaluator, peer evaluations involve coworkers only, and self-evaluations rely solely on the employee’s perspective; none of these capture the full spectrum of feedback the way a 360-degree approach does.

A 360-degree evaluation gathers feedback from multiple sources around the employee—supervisors, peers, direct reports, and often customers—along with the employee’s own self-assessment. This broad input creates a well-rounded, balanced view of performance, helping highlight strengths and identify development areas that a single evaluator might miss. The idea is to compare how the person sees themselves with how others see their work, which can reveal blind spots and provide richer direction for growth. In contrast, other methods sit at a single vantage point: narrative evaluations are usually written by one evaluator, peer evaluations involve coworkers only, and self-evaluations rely solely on the employee’s perspective; none of these capture the full spectrum of feedback the way a 360-degree approach does.